Updated: 07/30/2010
CHAPTER
8
HONEST CLEAR
THINKING IN THE CHURCH
Now
we are ready to take up the subject of Honesty and Clear Thinking in the church
and carry it to its conclusion. First let me say, many ministers who become Clear
Thinkers leave the church. Sometimes it is not their decision. The church makes
it for them. Many who leave the ministry, either forcibly or of their own
volition, go into teaching high school, college or seminary. But some go into
business of one kind or another.
Second,
the ones who stay are usually firmly entrenched, high up in the politics of the
church. Also, some are firmly established as liberal ministers of the church.
Third,
many of the Clear Thinkers in the church never fully realize they are Clear
Thinkers. They may or may not classify themselves as Free Thinkers. Many would
be horrified at someone classifying them as an Atheist. The reason is that most
of these ministers have never been exposed to any True definition of the
philosophy of Atheism. They only know the false one expounded by the church and
the religions. Since no one goes around asking "twenty questions" and
grading or tagging them, they never give a thought to identifying their
philosophical viewpoint. All they know is, Honesty in Scholarship, Truth and
Justice is more important to them than their Faith or Belief in the church
doctrines or claims. They are sincerely willing to follow the facts and truth
in any direction that they go.
(For
sure, some of you reading this may be Clear Thinkers right now and you did not
know it. Isn't it a wonderful position to be in, to discover you are an Honest
Clear Thinking person?)
The
only conflict they have is with the doctrines and claims of their church. They
are earnestly willing to do the good work of the church, as they understand it.
I have talked to literally hundreds of ministers, rabbis and priests
(literalists, conservatives and liberals). I have never found a single
minister, or seminary student, who did not have a problem (disagreement) with
one, two, or more of the doctrines, claims and pronouncements of their own church. So, in some respects, the liberal
minister and the Clear Thinking minister in the church are very nearly the
same. The difference, so far as the church claims and doctrines are concerned,
is only one of degree.
If
one had to truly believe all of the doctrines of any one of the denominations
in order to be one of its ministers, there would be absolutely No liberal
ministers in any of the Protestant or Catholic churches. We must omit the
Universalist and Unitarian churches. They readily admit their ministers do not
have to believe in the description of the God of the Bible. Neither do they
have to believe in the Bible as the "Words of God.” They will accept that
the
Bible is “Words or Opinions About God.”
Let
us set up a hypothetical examination of a Clear Thinking minister being
questioned by a board that is asked to approve or disapprove the minister's
call or appointment to a very liberal Protestant congregation. This could be
Baptist, Church of God, Presbyterian, Congregationalist, Church of Christ, or
any of the many other denominations where there are liberal churches that have
such boards set up to examine ministers. They all have specific theological questions
that apply only to their denomination. Here we are only concerned with the
general questions that one may think would entrap a Clear Thinker, if he were
honest.
You
will also notice that Clear Thinkers know how to use theological language and concepts
to their own advantage. This use of theological language and concepts also
confuses theologians when they use it on each other.
Q.
Dr. Smith, will you describe God to us?
A.
Definitely. There is no God named “God.” The term, God, is our personification
of the creative and sustaining life force of this universe. That organizing
force permeates every animate and inanimate object. It is everywhere, within,
without. Certainly, I can describe God. God is our name for the unexplainable
beginning, sustaining and ending of all things. Without this Organizing Force
we call God in our universe, there would not be a universe. (He could be
talking about electrical energy, gravity, magnetism, plasma energy, nature,
etc. Who knows what a life force is?)
This
is what the Deists said. The Deists were the founding fathers of this nation.
They gave us our Independence, the Constitution, its early laws and its
insistence that government derives its powers from the consent of the governed,
and not from any divine election or from a supernatural, personal God. They
rejected the Christian doctrines of a creator God, a Jesus God, a savior God,
hell, heaven, a Satan God, sin and salvation. That was total and without
exceptions. They rejected the divine inspiration of the Bible. They rejected
all supernatural dabbling and intervention into the affairs or health of man
and nations. In short, they rejected all organized religion and most religious
claims.
The
Deists were the controlling power in establishing the United States of America.
They were the Clear Thinkers of the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries. These Deists included men like Washington, Paine, Adams, Franklin and on up and down the political line. If they
lived today, the church would call them Atheists, as they were often called
during their own time.
This is very important.
In
establishing this nation, the Christians agreed with the Deists that the
governmental powers must be separate from religion. They knew what happened
when religion was in control of government. They or their fathers had recently
escaped the terrors of the church in Europe. They knew tyranny shortly followed
its connection and partnership with government. Look up “Deists” in the
encyclopedias. Remember, the definitions are written by
Christians.
Many
of the early signers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution,
were Christians. However, they, or their fathers, had recently escaped the
rule, the greedy hand and thumb of the church in Europe. They knew the tyranny
and injustice of the church when it has the power of government behind its
doctrines and rules. Therefore, they placed their vote and popularity squarely
in favor of keeping religion and government separated. Christians can use
common sense - sometimes.
Many
present day political and religious leaders try their best to "prove"
that these early founders of our nation were God-fearing men and that they were
guided by the concepts and teachings of Christianity. The fact of the matter is
Honest Clear Thinking guided these men. They knew the past and they knew the
power of ignorance and superstition and that injustice and terror followed in
the wake of religious power. Therefore whenever possible, they included some
form of religious language or concept so their basic and overall plan to give
freedom to the people of this nation (and world) could move forward. I have
heard politicians and ministers try to Christianize Lincoln, Washington or
Thomas Jefferson. They either lie about the facts, or quote some of their own
ministers and theologians who Did lie about those
things. These founders of our nation were Deists and they gave no ground,
morally, spiritually or politically to the Christians. They were reverent men.
They used only the good and true parts of the Bible and they were Clear
Thinkers! For that you can be thankful, whether you are a
Christian or not.
Yes,
they used the term "God, or Nature's God." But look at Their definition of God or Nature's God in their writings,
their correspondence and diaries. First, the people had to vote on the
Declaration of Independence, then on the Constitution. (The only voters were
white, male, landowners and citizens.) The people expected to see God or
religion mentioned somewhere in the documents. Second, they often used the term
"God or Nature's God." That left the term "God" as an
impersonal term to be defined by each individual. Third, they felt they could
give a little in order to get a lot for this country and its people. I think they
did an excellent job and it is a shame the religious believers today keep
trying to change those documents, always to the Loss of some of our freedoms.
These Deists accepted purely and simply the same things to which Clear Thinkers
of today adhere, "Honesty, Justice, Freedom and Logic.”
In
no way did any of them ever believe or accept the Biblical God or the Christian
churches' teachings. (It may or may not be interesting to note, almost all of
them belonged to an outlawed organization called, “Free Masons of British
America.” These were Clear Thinking men. Let us return to the examination.
Q.
Dr. Smith, do you believe Jesus was the Son of God?
A.
Certainly, he was. In fact, Jesus himself said, we are all the Sons of God in a
unique way. The life force of God enters us and we call that form the Holy
Spirit. It is in all of us to some degree. Some men manifest more of the Spirit
of God in their lives than do others. Jesus himself said we are all children of
God and therefore, Sons or Daughters of God.
In
saying this, Dr. Smith has equated Jesus and all mankind as equal. He has
turned a question, which, to a Literalist or Conservative, has to do with the
divinity of Jesus, into a statement saying Jesus and all men are alike. They
are all either divine or they are all mortal. He has further done this using
the very words of Jesus in the Bible. No one will argue with him without
accusing Jesus of lying or of being ill informed. So, no one on an examining
board will question such a statement.
Q. Thank
you, Dr. Smith. Tell us your understanding of the Holy Spirit.
A.
The Holy Spirit is the influence and attitude of all the good traits of a good
and just Godliness. It is the infusion in all of us to some degree of the
Spirit of love, caring, compassion, understanding and wisdom. If followed, this
Spirit in us makes us more God like, more human and more humane. The Holy
Spirit of God is all this and more.
Here
Dr. Smith has equated the teaching about the Holy Spirit with what the outcome
should be in our lives after we have the attitude and spirit of a good and just
Godliness within us. Notice that he has avoided the concept of a Trinity of
Gods.
Q.
We would like to ask you this time about the Church. Do you see the Church as
the special vessel of God to carry the gospel into all the
world?
A. The
Christian Church is unique in man's history. It has claimed the special
responsibility to sort out, preserve and distribute the will of God among men.
The Church should also be an example, a moral light shining in the darkness,
drawing men unto it. This is the gospel we share with all men. All men must be
made a part of the Godly plan to share the morality and bounty of this earth
with one another. They must be taught to develop their mind to the fullest and
then to use that mind for the up lifting and betterment of themselves and all
mankind. The Church must do this. It must be the Servant From God and not the
Boss For God. But the church can only demonstrate that servitude when it serves
mankind in his many and various needs.
A
Catholic could argue here but only from the various pronouncements of the many
decrees of the Catholic Church. What a Conservative or Literalist would wish to
hear is, the Church should seek and save the lost souls and bring them into the
Kingdom of God (for Kingdom of God read, local church - theirs). Dr. Smith has
bypassed the concept of the church as being a ruler and savior of souls and
moved on to what the church should be doing after the souls are in the church,
according to the Bible teachings. Also, notice he says, "The church has Claimed
(for and by itself), this special responsibility." He has also included
all men (and women) in the duties and responsibilities of the church.
Q.
Aptly put, Dr. Smith. Please describe the gospel to us.
A.
The gospel is the good news. It is the good news that man no longer has to be a
slave to his greed, his corruption, his passions or his ignorance. He can be
free. The good news is the preaching of the word that love is better than
arrogance, knowledge is better than ignorance, peace is better than turmoil,
sharing is better than coveting and truth is better than falsehood. It presents
salvation to all mankind from all those things that would drag him down and
destroy him in this world, provided he will accept the good news and live it.
Here
Dr. Smith again ignores a hell to be saved from and deals with the present
evils from which all mankind needs to be saved. The gospel he is talking about
is that man should be the best Man he can possibly be. It is hard to argue with
such a practical answer and application of the good news.
Q.
Could you give us your estimation of the Bible as The Word of God, Dr. Smith?
A.
The Bible is the most distinctive book in the hands of western man today. It contains
the record from ancient times of man's quest for God, of his failures and
successes. It outlines the changes of man's concept of God from a thundering,
jealous, tyrant, demanding revenge on his enemies, to the understanding of God
as a spiritual Father who loves and forgives and cares for this earth and all
of its people. The Bible reveals much good to us and contains teachings that
strengthen our understanding of ourselves and of our fellow man. It warns of
the evils of those days and these. It tries to understand human nature and
seeks to raise man to a higher plane of existence. The Bible sings praises to
life and nature. One's education is lacking until he understands the Bible and
learns to rightly divide its teachings and admonitions.
Of
course, to Dr. Smith, “understanding and rightly dividing," means
separating the false from the true. It means separating the moral from the
immoral.
I
think that concludes the theological questions, Dr. Smith. Now tell us how you
would administer the programs of this church?
Dr.
Smith, the Clear Thinker, has passed with flying colors. The examiners may or
may not be in full agreement with all Dr. Smith said, but he said enough. He
has a past record of Liberalism in the church so they expected those answers.
The church knows Dr. Smith is liberal. Dr. Smith may be one of the best-liked
and most successful ministers of the church.
Not
once has Dr. Smith said he himself believes any of the doctrines of the church.
He will say how he Interprets those
doctrines. But he will never say he believes them without qualifying his
answers. He knows most of the doctrines will not stand testing of any kind. You
can only believe them or doubt them. You can bet that the Liberal ministers of
the church doubt most of them.
Is
Dr. Smith honest? My answer is, yes! He has not lied. Dr. Smith does not see
the church as anything more than just another organization of man, like a
corporation or government. He sees he can be of great value to many people
around him in the church. He can have a respected platform from which to work
and correct social injustices, political corruption and the like. He can
preach, inspire and teach intelligent people some of the rudiments of thinking
and living. And best of all, at no time does he have to cover up his philosophy
of life. He can also direct his denomination along a more liberal and
worthwhile path. If he has enough support, he can try to change the
denomination's doctrines and policies. He has as much right to do so as do the
conservatives or literalists, who try to make the doctrines of their church
even more restrictive, more harsh, unjust and narrow.
HONESTY
IS THINKING AND ACTING ON THE BASIS OF THE FACTS.
You
may ask, doesn't this continual tug of war between Literalist, Conservative and
Liberal cause churches and denominations to split up? It does! In fact, All of the denominations in Christianity today, originally
split off from some other church because they didn't agree with a change of
doctrine, or wanted a change that didn't pass. That includes the Roman Church
and the Baptist Church.
Since
the Clear Thinker sees absolutely nothing divine about the church, the real
question is one of expediency. "What is best for me and those around me in
this place and at this point in time?" That is the question that has to be
answered. Since only the individual involved can be honest about what is best
for him, given his specific individuality, then that person alone is
responsible for making his own choice. Some stay and some leave.
The
same thinking and evaluation goes into decisions about going into politics,
teaching, selling or business of some sort. The Clear Thinker does not view
anything in life as divine (in the religious sense). That includes religion,
government, marriage, money or relationships of any kind. Nor does the Clear
Thinker view himself or herself as divine. He tries to see things like he finds
them to be or like he knows them to be. Everything in life is
"Special" and to a Clear Thinker that is honesty.
Will
a Clear Thinker steal? Will a Christian? It depends. Will he divorce his wife,
or she her husband? Will a Christian? It depends. Will he lie? Will a
Christian? It depends.
It
is interesting to note that professed nonbelievers, who officially make up
about 8 percent of the population of the USA, make up only about .002 percent
of the criminal population for any given year. That is only about one out of
every five hundred criminals. Either Clear Thinkers and other nonbelievers are
very smart and careful not to get caught or they are by far our most law
abiding and honest citizens in the United States.
The
largest proportion of our lawbreakers is from the Literalist or fundamentalist
religions. They make up about a fourth of our population and yet furnish over
40 percent of our criminals. That is two out of every five criminals. The
Catholics furnish a disproportional share of criminals with over 30 percent, or
one out of every three. The Conservative denominations (not counting the
Catholics) furnish almost 20 percent, or one out of every five criminals. The
Liberal churches furnish less than 4 percent. The Jewish, Oriental religions
and sects furnish the rest.
In
other words, every type of religious classification furnishes more than its
proportional share of criminals except unbelievers and very liberal Christians.
These are our best and most law abiding citizens. Be sure and ask yourself why
does religion and belief make so many criminals? (See the Statesman's Yearbook.
Type it into Google and get the British edition. It is the best-uncensored
version. The American version is highly censored in order to hide the results
of the religious and governmental errors and poor judgments.)
From
this it is easy to see that the more Liberal the group, the lower will be the
criminal percentage of that group. This means the more Liberal the person, the
less likely he is to resort to unlawful or violent means to accomplish what he
wishes to have and to be in life. There are many of these stories, some true
and some not true, but this story will illustrate the point.
[This
prodigal Islamic fellow was in jail for murder, robbery, spouse abuse and a few
other charges. His meal was served and he protested that his religion was being
violated because ham was on his plate. He said, "Faithful Moslems do not
eat pork."]
There
are also stories about Catholics, Protestants and Jews. The point is the
believer believes anything he does will be forgiven by the Almighty. As long as
he carries out his religious and denominational requirements, he will still be
in good standing with his God. He even believes that his God has commanded
violence against the enemies of his God. Thus, he is more likely to become a
criminal.
The
Clear Thinker knows he is totally responsible for his actions and there is no
magic wand, no supernatural being standing ready to undo the damage, so he acts
much more responsibly and rationally.
To
be fair, the amount of education a person has also generally tends to parallel
the criminal figures. But this brings out another point. The more educated a
person is, the less he can believe, so the more liberal he becomes in his
thinking. The more liberal he becomes the more honest he becomes and the more
likely he is to become a Clear Thinker. That is something else to think about.
The
educated Liberal is always tentative in proclaiming his opinion on any matter.
Why? Because in spite of all he knows, he also knows there is still much more
knowledge about the subject that he does not know.
The
believer on the other hand, is always adamant and inflexible in his opinion.
Why? Because he Thinks he knows it all and
there is nothing else to know or find out about the matter or about his
opinion. Most of the time he says, "The Bible says” or “God says."
The believer applies this same inflexibility to his politics. The believer is
always right and all others are always wrong. One of the worst sins for the
believer is called "Compromise.”
Religion
tells people there is a divine and eternal standard of morality handed down by God.
This standard of conduct is to be for all people and for all time. It is to be
the only true guide to life. Of course, there are many things we can do that
are very harmful to us and to those around us. The Clear Thinking philosophy is
the first to recognize this fact. There are also many things that are harmful
to some people because of their immaturity, and yet, those same things are
uplifting and wholesome to others Because of their maturity. (See:
"Morality" in Chapter 33.)
It
is dangerous and therefore immoral to let little children play with household
electricity. But for an adult who knows what he is doing, it can be very
productive and rewarding. There are many kinds of activity that can be
symbolized by this example of the child and electricity. Sex, drugs, traffic
and personal relationships are some of those areas. Maturity and morality are
the products and rewards of Honest Thinking and Honest living. Good wholesome
Morality is not a product sold in a God Shop (church). It is not a gift! You
must make it yourself! Good Morality is a do it yourself project.
Most
western religions tend to keep people from growing morally as well as mentally.
In many ways, there are fifty and sixty year old religious people who morally
are still children. The church likes it that way. These people are still
incapable of making honest, personal moral decisions. They are still letting
mother and daddy (that is, the church and the Bible) make their moral decisions
for them. Just saying "No" is an ignorant response and is never
enough. One must know Why and When something is wrong.
Today, religious people are banding together trying to force these same
infantile approaches to life upon the American people. They are running for
political office, and worst of all, many, many immature people will vote for
them.
The
concept of Honesty demands that one shall have room to express that honesty in
the decisions of life. The very foundation of morality is Honesty. Yet, the
religious wish to con us with a system of morality, the very basis of which is
a dishonest belief. Every sane person knows it is morally and socially wrong to
murder or to steal. This is not divine wisdom. This is common sense. Many
religious rules, however, would have us believe it is morally wrong and a religious
sin to divorce one's spouse, no matter the circumstances. They would have us
believe it is a mortal sin to disbelieve the narrow and immoral system of
religion and morality that they teach. They would have us believe sex was the
invention of a Deity and only has meaning and divine acceptance, as well as
social acceptance, if the two people are married by a priest or minister of
religion and are engaged in producing a baby. They would have us believe it is
morally wrong to hunt for the truth about these religious matters, or to
associate with those who do hunt for truth.
The
list of moral wrongs supplied by the church looks like a long list of things to
do when one wishes to go on a vacation or have some fun. It has in fact been
joked about. That is, anything that is fun, fattening or fills the bank
account, the church has declared it to be a Religious Sin.
Such
a list includes many laughable and frivolous notions about what is sin and what
is not. A random sample includes sex outside of marriage, sex for fun, keeping
company with nonbelievers, reading certain books and novels, sex with oneself,
wearing skimpy clothes, not praying, drinking alcohol, using certain drugs,
dancing, playing cards, rolling dice, not being in church on certain days, cursing,
gambling, disobedience and of course that great bug-a-boo, honest doubting.
However, All sins can be forgiven with the exception of not believing (honestly
doubting).
Honest
Doubt and Honest Thinking are the killer sins in religion. Why? “Whoever believes
and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.”
(Mk. 16:16.) Doubt is a thinking process. Believing is a non-thinking process.
If one honestly and factually thinks, he will see the falseness of the church,
Bible and doctrines of the religions. If he Thinks, he will not obey, he will
not pay, he will not agree and he will oppose the church and its effort to rule
and enslave mankind. So, he is un-savable (according to the Bible). Who really
believes that a Just, Good and Almighty God is that unjust, narrow minded and
hostile toward Honest Thought?
Who
believes a just God gave us a good brain and then forbid us to use it to find
out if what man says about God is fact or fiction, true or false? Who believes a good God let his son be tortured
and murdered so we would stop thinking and start believing? Who believes those things? The Christians! Shame, shame!
The
Clear Thinker's philosophy does not have all of these childish rules and
guidelines. To follow the Clear Thinking philosophy one will have to do some
hard honest thinking about what is right and what is wrong. He will have to
weigh the legal, social and personal results of the activities in which he
wishes to engage. If one is wrong, he does not have a deity whom he can beg to
correct the wrong, or to forgive him for his mistakes. He must recognize
mistakes as the best teachers in the world, if he makes the necessary
corrections. The Clear Thinker must not only Think Honestly, but he must also
Act Honestly with himself and with others. The Clear Thinking philosophy is
Honesty in action.
There
are Clear Thinkers in the churches of today. They are there because they have
made a choice to be there. They are in fact, some of the best leaders and
ministers of the major denominations. You will find them trying to undo the
harm that the church has done to people. You will find them in the front of
social programs that are trying to make a better life for people. If it were
not for the stabilizing effect of some of these Liberal men and women, the
churches may have already seized the political and leadership power that they
so desperately crave in this country.
The
religious believers work fair or foul to obtain power in order to take away our
freedoms and to institute in its place a government that takes its rules and
guides from the church and Bible. They want the government to spy on the people
to determine if they are thinking (believing) and acting like the church or
government wants them to. They want a religious theocracy, a government ruled
over by Their God and Their church doctrines. That is, they want religious
tyranny. They want Their Bible, Their doctrines and Their
church teachings to be the national basis for this country's laws and
leadership. They know best about sex, children out of wedlock, education,
wealth, crime, abortion, law, economics, politics, poverty, war and any other
subjects that arise. It is a shame they do not know more about these things
especially poverty, hunger, sickness and harmful political actions. They are
spending billions of dollars to propagate their beliefs and to buy political
power. They only want people in power who believe like they do. They only want
the blind to lead the blind. They even want the blind to lead those who can see.
I do not need a blind man to lead me. I have some of the light of truth and
knowledge to guide me.
Believers
are masters at sleight-of-hand and sleight-of-mind. They will use any available
controversial idea or situation to advance their control over people and to
enhance their power. They will spend millions of dollars to get their people
worked up. They will advertise their ideas and positions, as one would promote
toothpaste or pizza on television and radio. They will use character
assassinations on those whom they have decided are “the enemy - who are
following the Devil.” I see abortion, drugs, crime and homosexuality as areas
that they will probably use to attempt gaining political power and creating
more chaos. (Written in 1989.)
(Most
of this chapter was written and completed in 1989. I have left the preceding in
to show that even back then the "righteous right" were trying hard to
do what they are being able to do today.)
Thank goodness
for the Clear Thinkers in the church and in the political circles. They are
trying to slow down the push by the Believers who wish to take control of this
country through the Republican Party. Watch out for the 1992 elections! (This,
written in 1989, has turned out to be So True.)
Down
the line in today's world, the churches are beginning to show their true colors
and the people of this country should not long submit to the narrow and
infantile philosophies and beliefs that the church seeks to impose upon the
people of this nation. Before long, the church is going to have to pay taxes.
They must learn to speak the truth about their doctrines and tall tales. They
are going to lose their nonprofit status unless they become nonprofit. They are
going to lose their censorship power. They are going to have to pay for their
advertising. They must learn to find some human needs in our world and render
help, not just words. They must stop extracting wealth from the poor, the
gullible and the ignorant. They must stop telling their lies.
Yes,
there are Clear Thinkers in the church and for that you can give thanks. We
must support those who are trying to bring honesty, justice and humanity back
into our churches.
It
may be the Clear Thinkers who save the believers' churches for them! Why?
Because Clear Thinkers know that if any group is repressed, then every group is
in danger. I want freedom for the churches. I also want honesty and
responsibility from them.
We
find that the Clear Thinkers in the church are far more Honest than is the
church itself.
THE CHURCH NEEDS OUR HELP!
THE CHURCH NEEDS HONESTY!
(Have you contacted an official of your faith? Were you surprised at the
difference in what you believe and what you are officially supposed to believe?
Most people have a generic type of Christianity. When their personal beliefs
are measured against what they are supposed to believe, according to their own
religion and its doctrines, one finds the personal beliefs are very different
from the official doctrines.)
Thomas E.
Blaylock
Copyright: 1989
Updated:
07/30/2010
